<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bsd on passthejoe</title>
    <link>https://relvokcor.xyz/~passthejoe/hugo/blog/bsd/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bsd on passthejoe</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2025, Steven Rosenberg.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:06:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://relvokcor.xyz/~passthejoe/hugo/blog/bsd/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Ruby gems: Using Linux/BSD packages vs. gem install</title>
      <link>https://relvokcor.xyz/~passthejoe/hugo/ruby-gems-using-linux/bsd-packages-vs.-gem-install/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:06:15 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://relvokcor.xyz/~passthejoe/hugo/ruby-gems-using-linux/bsd-packages-vs.-gem-install/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As a Ruby user and programmer, I thought that Linux distributions and BSD projects offered packaged versions of Ruby gems to add sanity and stability to a computer.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The problem is that every distribution and project packages a different subset of all the Ruby gems available.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve always tried to use as many &amp;ldquo;packaged&amp;rdquo; gems as possible in the systems I run — chiefly Debian and Fedora Linux, along with OpenBSD.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
