Extended War Report

Overview

This is an extended war report for the war 50142 between Shadow Reapers BRC and INSANITY X. Data is presented from the side of INSANITY X. Link to the official war report can be found HERE.

Rewards

War outcome for your faction: Loss
Total hits done: 5191
War hits: 4339
Non war hits: 852
Total respect earned: 42443.76
Members contributed: 75/84

---

Rewards for your faction:

Name	Amount	Price
Melee Cache	3	386.36 M
Medium Arms Cache	4	731.76 M
Small Arms Cache	4	475.6 M
Armor Cache	1	311.75 M

---

Earnings from caches: 1.91 B
Total earnings: 1.91 B¹

¹prices are based on market value or approximate trader prices if market value is unavaliable.

War Preparation

NOTE: Faction Xanax might be different from Prep Xanax due to how personal stats are calculated. In this case, Faction Xanax is more accurate.

Members who did not stack energy before war:

Members who overdosed during war preparations (but could still have stacked):

Members who most likely stacked energy before war (or just used lots of xanax):

Fighting summary

Top 5

Top 5 by overall contribution %

Name	Contribution
IMEZI	4.26
Huwmungus	4.22
Chromehomie	3.45
Togdish	3.27
plomlol	3.24

Top 5 by War hits

Name	War_Hits
Huwmungus	219
IMEZI	204
Chromehomie	178
Togdish	168
plomlol	159

Top 5 by Non War hits

Name	Non_War_Hits
KatieWalker	67
Haughty	52
KillJohnDoe	45
Mr-Nasty	43
KiNO_ua	42

Top 5 by Total hits

Name	Total_Hits
IMEZI	221
Huwmungus	219
Chromehomie	179
Togdish	170
plomlol	168

Top 5 by Assists

Name	Assists
WaterWytch	33
Peter	28
Vinnie-Ruffalo	23
Huwmungus	20
Chromehomie	20

Chain savers - List of people who saved the chain with less than 60 seconds remaining.

## [1] "Friendly chain savers:"

Saver	Chain	Time remaining
Info-Broker	1571	18
Battenhall	1435	18
Battenhall	1434	18
Battenhall	1432	19
Battenhall	1429	13
Battenhall	1428	18
Battenhall	1427	28
Battenhall	1426	11
Battenhall	1425	23
Info-Broker	1424	41
Info-Broker	1423	28
Koldar	1421	26
Koldar	1418	27
Koldar	1416	34
Koldar	1415	32
Koldar	1414	18
Koldar	1413	38
Koldar	1408	14
BankMoneyNHoney	1403	20
Togdish	1402	39
Togdish	1222	55
Wolphstar	930	48
Lucky_Pablo	730	52
plomlol	728	38
MiiLKY	727	8
MiiLKY	726	10
Lucky_Pablo	725	44
MiiLKY	724	10
MiiLKY	723	3
MiiLKY	722	7
MiiLKY	721	16
Fergy	717	25
MiiLKY	716	17
MiiLKY	715	16
MiiLKY	714	16
Lucky_Pablo	713	35
Info-Broker	712	55
Info-Broker	710	34
Lucky_Pablo	708	28
Lucky_Pablo	707	35
Info-Broker	706	9
Info-Broker	705	59
Info-Broker	702	49
l3luntrauma	670	56
Togdish	549	27
Togdish	548	4
MiiLKY	492	56
Togdish	485	42
IMEZI	363	47
Yakoi	345	58
Jx_Lion	233	28
tanweer_50	232	60
AaronAA	198	52
Togdish	115	33
Chromehomie	110	56
JimmyHearse	85	12
Jinjardi	76	57
Vin5ang	76	60
Superly	47	33
Mr-Nasty	33	58

## [1] "No enemy chain saves found!"

Visual summary

Only including members with non-zero contribution

Respect

Respect earned by each member.¹
Total respect earned: 42443.76
Total respect lost: 11800.59
Net respect change: 30643.17²
Average respect earned per attack: 7.26

¹Chain bonuses are ignored in per-member contributions.
²Respect lost will be 0 if using non-faction API key.

War Score

Looking at war score gained and lost by each member.
The calculations IGNORE chain bonuses in order to better reflect actual contribution rather than landing a lucky hit
Total score earned: 34294.84
Total score lost: 46412.11¹
Median net score per member: -127.98²

¹Score lost will be 0 if using non-faction API key.
²Using median instead of mean to avoid extreme values skewing the metric.

Slackers

Members who did not meet 1% contribution cutoff

Name	Contribution
Jx_Lion	0.98
BeetleCape	0.94
KiNO_ua	0.89
Fergy	0.85
1Levi	0.81
Zinzillino	0.81
Gaal	0.77
Wolphstar	0.77
SFCHunt25	0.77
xXY-O-U-C-3-FXx	0.75
GreyMareSK	0.71
Yar_Evets	0.69
Adadda	0.69
Crystal34543	0.69
Edward_Conan	0.64
Jet1337	0.60
SirrusTV	0.58
Cxssidy	0.58
Chapstick	0.56
GLACK	0.52
CA_Bulldog	0.50
Alliox	0.50
Cikez	0.44
Glorp24	0.42
skippymagnifcen	0.39
D_Dobbo	0.33
BankMoneyNHoney	0.33
NOXX	0.31
LemeTheThird	0.27
Dart455	0.23
ganvague68	0.17
Eversince	0.17
Killua27	0.13
Serkitt	0.12
Schnitz386	0.08
SimonBicks	0.00
Correr	0.00
Woodzy	0.00
DCupDanger	0.00
SkylarisBack	0.00
Jaci69	0.00
ClarissaRae	0.00
Invictusss	0.00
FlikinFire	0.00

Energy

Summary of who wasted the most energy and who cost the enemy the most energy.
Calculated by adding up Losses (and Stalemates, Defends, Escapes, Interrupts) and Defends, the multiplying the number by 25.
E_Wasted means the member spent X energy on attacks that failed.
E_Stolen means X energy was wasted by the enemy on attacking the member unsuccessfully.
You might want to take a closer look at members with high E_Wasted values and remind them to pick fights they can win!

¹ These numbers will be 0 if you are using an API key WITHOUT faction access.

Full table

Full table with filters and search

Extra details

Xanax and refill usage

Xanax and Energy refill usage during the war.

Total Xanax used: 346
Xanax costs: 306.71 M
Total Refills used: 136
Refill costs: 105.66 M

Drug cost in plot is in millions.

Booster and can usage

Energy can and Booster usage during the war.

Total Boosters used: 67
Booster costs: 949.48 M
Total Cans used: 244
Can costs: 522.11 M

All Boosters are assumed to be FHCs and Can price is set to average market value for ALL cans.

Booster cost in plot is in 10s of millions.

Armory usage (BETA)

This is a summary of Armory usage during the preparation and war period.
It can be useful for getting a good idea of how much consumables were used during the war in total.

¹ This section will be empty if you are using an API key WITHOUT faction access.

During preparation

## [1] "Preparation Armory usage:"

## [1] "Preparation usage totals:"

## [1] "Only showing consumables"

During war

## [1] "War Armory usage:"

## [1] "War usage totals:"

## [1] "Only showing consumables"

Activity

Member activity during the war in hours.

## [1] "Correlation between activity and contribution:"

## [1] 0.59

Hospital

Summary of times hospitalized during the war

Full table

AI summary (BETA)

This is an experimental portion of the report - an overview of the war generated by AI.
When looking at this section, keep that in mind and take the results with a grain of salt.
Before taking any actions that might impact faction members mentioned in this summary, double-check that there are no mistakes or missed key details.

Post-War Debrief

1) Overall Faction Performance

Participation and output

• Roster: 84 members.
• Direct war participants: 69/84 (82.1%) recorded at least one War_Hit.
• Zero-war-hit members: 15/84 (17.9%). Several of these members were active or invested resources but did not convert that effort into direct war progress.
• Total War_Hits: 4,339.

Participation volume was respectable, but the faction did not convert that volume into a favorable score result.

Net-score outcome

• Positive Net_Score generated: +13,018.07
• Negative Net_Score conceded: -24,975.28
• Faction aggregate Net_Score: -11,957.21
• Positive-score members: 33/84 (39.3%)
• Negative-score members: 50/84 (59.5%)
• Neutral: 1 member

For every 1 point gained, the faction gave back roughly 1.92 points. This is the central failure of the war: the faction produced a high number of hits, but target selection, survival, and efficiency were not sufficient to prevent the enemy from extracting substantially more score.

Energy efficiency

Energy waste was concentrated among a number of low-output or zero-output members. Several players recorded 1,000+ E_Wasted, often alongside negative Net_Score and high Hospital time. This indicates failed outgoing attacks were not isolated incidents; they were a meaningful drag on faction performance.

There were also positive defensive cases—members with high E_Stolen—but those gains did not offset the much broader score losses.

---

2) Team Issues & Strategic Bottlenecks

A. Too many members generated negative score

The biggest systemic problem was not participation—it was unprofitable participation.

Members with meaningful hit counts still frequently finished negative because Score_Down and E_Wasted exceeded their Score_Up. Examples:

• Shelkad: 52 War_Hits, -749.86 Net_Score
• Yakoi: 78 War_Hits, -428.05
• Vin5ang: 99 War_Hits, only +89.30
• Superly: 148 War_Hits, only +246.93 despite 14 losses
• Togdish: 168 War_Hits, +569.19, but 9 losses
• Vinnie-Ruffalo: 103 War_Hits, only +142.62, with 10 losses

The lesson is clear: volume alone was not enough. The faction needed stronger target filtering and more disciplined engagement decisions.

B. Excessive energy waste from weak engagement selection

The worst E_Wasted totals came from members whose attacks did not produce enough score to justify the cost:

Member	E_Wasted	Net_Score	Key concern
FlikinFire	1,487.10	-1,487.10	Zero War_Hits; complete non-conversion
ganvague68	1,207.87	-1,178.26	9 War_Hits; highly inefficient
Edward_Conan	1,180.82	-994.46	32 War_Hits, 119 Hospital
D_Dobbo	1,171.99	-1,036.18	15 War_Hits, 114 Hospital
irieee	1,155.39	-523.90	71 War_Hits, but 126 Hospital
Yakoi	1,127.92	-428.05	Good activity and FairFight, poor score conversion
SimonBicks	1,096.63	-1,096.63	Zero War_Hits
AaronAA	1,047.21	-620.63	52 War_Hits but 51 Hospital
KiNO_ua	1,031.33	-1,014.98	4 War_Hits, 97 Hospital
ElderKirkus	1,031.54	-423.10	58 War_Hits, but poor survivability

These players should have been redirected toward safer targets, assist chains, or held for coordinated strikes rather than repeatedly committing energy into losing engagements.

C. Hospital exposure was a major vulnerability

High Hospital totals were often paired with negative score and low direct output:

• FlikinFire: 155 Hospital, 0 War_Hits, -1,487.10
• Invictusss: 153 Hospital, 0 War_Hits, -689.41
• irieee: 126 Hospital, -523.90
• Edward_Conan: 119 Hospital, -994.46
• Zinzillino: 115 Hospital, -622.15
• D_Dobbo: 114 Hospital, -1,036.18
• SimonBicks: 111 Hospital, 0 War_Hits, -1,096.63
• Alliox: 109 Hospital, 0 War_Hits, -379.69
• Vin5ang: 108 Hospital despite 99 War_Hits

This pattern suggests either members were repeatedly exposed to stronger opponents or were being used without sufficient protection, timing, or target intelligence.

D. Finishing-move discipline was generally good

Mugging was not a major faction-wide issue:

• Total recorded Mugs: 5
  • Superly: 2
  • plomlol: 2
  • KyleJam: 1

Most members avoided mugging, which is positive. The primary issue was not finish selection; it was losing attacks and absorbing score losses.

E. Losses were concentrated among several high-volume attackers

High losses reduced the value of otherwise active members:

• Superly: 14 losses
• Vin5ang: 14 losses
• Utzp: 10 losses
• Vinnie-Ruffalo: 10 losses
• KyleJam: 10 losses
• Togdish: 9 losses
• Grandbitzky, Info-Broker, Edward_Conan, Mr-Nasty, plomlol: 6 losses each

Some of these members still ended positive, but the loss rate indicates overly aggressive target selection or insufficiently coordinated attacks.

---

3) Individual Highlights — Great Performers

Elite war contributors

Member	War_Hits	Assists	Net_Score	Notable strengths
IMEZI	204	12	+1,420.49	Best overall score result; 51 retaliations; only 25 E_Wasted; 500 E_Stolen
Huwmungus	219	20	+1,355.28	Highest War_Hits; 1,000 E_Stolen; 46 retaliations; major can investment
Lucky_Pablo	136	17	+1,100.88	Excellent score conversion; strong FairFight at 2.15
Peter	130	28	+1,070.17	Exceptional coordination and endurance; 54 cans; only 286.39 score lost
MiiLKY	93	3	+773.62	Strong efficiency; 19 cans; 500 E_Stolen; low Hospital
l3luntrauma	147	7	+656.88	High direct output with no recorded losses
Chromehomie	178	20	+560.17	Excellent volume; strong assist contribution
Togdish	168	10	+569.19	High output and investment, though losses need reduction
CodingBeaver	148	13	+542.82	Reliable positive volume; 9 retaliations
Info-Broker	130	12	+518.97	Exceptional result for level 15; 325 E_Stolen and strong retaliation activity

Defensive standouts: high E_Stolen

These members imposed meaningful enemy energy costs through failed attacks:

• Huwmungus: 1,000 E_Stolen
• WaterWytch: 900 E_Stolen
• MiiLKY: 500 E_Stolen
• IMEZI: 500 E_Stolen
• Superly: 500 E_Stolen
• D_Dobbo: 450 E_Stolen
• Peter: 400 E_Stolen
• 1Levi: 375 E_Stolen
• Togdish / Chromehomie: 300 E_Stolen each

Of these, Huwmungus, MiiLKY, IMEZI, Peter, and Chromehomie combined defensive resilience with positive score production. That is the model to replicate.

FairFight and efficiency standouts

FairFight values around 2.5 indicate strong engagement efficiency. The best members who also produced useful score were:

• 1Levi: FairFight 2.58, +268.05 Net_Score, only 91.70 score lost
• Yar_Evets: FairFight 2.53, +224.27 Net_Score
• Adadda: FairFight 2.55, though still negative overall
• Moonlightenng: FairFight 2.49, slight positive score
• Lucky_Pablo: FairFight 2.15, but much stronger score output than the above

Investment leaders

The largest can/refill commitments came from:

• Peter: 54 cans
• KyleJam: 47 cans
• Huwmungus: 28 cans
• IMEZI: 23 cans
• MiiLKY: 19 cans
• Togdish: 18 cans
• Jx_Lion / Woodzy: 15 cans each

Peter, Huwmungus, IMEZI, MiiLKY, and Togdish converted investment into meaningful field presence. Woodzy, by contrast, did not convert investment into war output.

---

4) Individual Highlights — Underperformers

Major score drains

Member	War_Hits	Hospital	E_Wasted	Net_Score	Assessment
FlikinFire	0	155	1,487.10	-1,487.10	Most damaging individual result; no direct war output
ganvague68	9	82	1,207.87	-1,178.26	Severe energy inefficiency for minimal output
SimonBicks	0	111	1,096.63	-1,096.63	No war hits; repeated score loss
D_Dobbo	15	114	1,171.99	-1,036.18	Low output and heavy exposure
KiNO_ua	4	97	1,031.33	-1,014.98	High FairFight does not compensate for very low output and losses
Edward_Conan	32	119	1,180.82	-994.46	Heavy hospital time and failed-attack cost
skippymagnifcen	20	93	1,013.01	-919.55	Insufficient output for cost absorbed
DCupDanger	0	88	917.07	-917.07	Zero direct contribution
CA_Bulldog	2	92	859.47	-845.33	Minimal war participation with major score loss
Woodzy	0	85	828.68	-828.68	Significant can investment without any War_Hits

Other concerning low-conversion cases

• Crystal34543: 0 War_Hits, 81 Hospital, -800.63.
• Cxssidy: 12 War_Hits, 95 Hospital, -679.06.
• xXY-O-U-C-3-FXx: 9 War_Hits, 71 Hospital, -617.17.
• Zinzillino: 29 War_Hits, 115 Hospital, -622.15.
• AaronAA: 52 War_Hits but -620.63; output did not justify 1,047.21 E_Wasted.
• Glorp24: FairFight 2.52 but -589.77; efficient engagements were too few to overcome score losses.
• KillJohnDoe: 32 War_Hits and FairFight 2.43, but -574.47. More selective targeting was needed.
• LadyVendetta: 52 War_Hits, but -108.19 due to high Score_Down relative to gains.
• Shelkad: 52 War_Hits and 9 retaliations, but -749.86—an especially poor conversion rate.

---

5) Additional Observations

High activity with limited or zero war impact

Several members were present but did not translate activity into war value:

• KatieWalker: 31.251 activity hours, 0 War_Hits, -230.21. Most activity went into 67 Non_War_Hits rather than direct war progress.
• Schnitz386: 18.605 hours, 0 War_Hits, -56.55.
• Eversince: 22.354 hours, only 1 War_Hit, -437.17 despite 6 cans.
• Woodzy: invested 15 cans but produced 0 War_Hits and -828.68.
• FlikinFire: 0 War_Hits while becoming the largest score drain.
• Invictusss: 0 War_Hits, 153 Hospital, -689.41.
• SkylarisBack: effectively inactive; 0 War_Hits, 0 activity impact, neutral score.

FairFight alone did not guarantee war value

Several members showed strong FairFight values but still ended negative:

• Alliox: 2.74 FairFight, 0 War_Hits, -379.69
• tanweer_50: 2.66, 53 War_Hits, -141.60
• KiNO_ua: 2.63, 4 War_Hits, -1,014.98
• BeetleCape: 2.59, 13 War_Hits, -542.83
• Glorp24: 2.52, 22 War_Hits, -589.77
• Yakoi: 2.45, 78 War_Hits, -428.05

This indicates the faction should not evaluate members on FairFight in isolation. It must be read alongside War_Hits, Hospital, E_Wasted, and Net_Score.

Recommended strategic corrections

1. Create target tiers before the next war. Members with repeated losses or 500+ E_Wasted should receive safer target lists or operate only in coordinated chains.
2. Track negative-score thresholds live. Once a member falls heavily negative, leadership should intervene before further energy is wasted.
3. Prioritize the high-conversion core. IMEZI, Huwmungus, Peter, Lucky_Pablo, MiiLKY, l3luntrauma, Chromehomie, CodingBeaver, and Info-Broker should be central to offensive planning.
4. Use low-strength or high-hospital members in assist/support roles. Repeated solo attacks by low-conversion players were costly.
5. Separate activity from effectiveness. High activity, can use, or FairFight is only valuable when it produces positive Net_Score and direct war impact.
6. Maintain current anti-mug discipline. Mugging was rare and should remain the exception.

Bottom Line

The faction had adequate participation and several outstanding contributors, but the war was lost on efficiency and score protection. The positive core was strong; however, it was overwhelmed by a much larger group of negative-score contributors, high Hospital exposure, and repeated failed attacks. The next war should focus less on raw hit volume and more on controlled target selection, coordinated chains, and rapidly removing inefficient attackers from unfavorable engagements.